|
Post by Ariella on Sept 3, 2015 17:55:45 GMT
After reading this story I had to read it again. The message was so simple yet so profound at the same time. What really made me wonder, was why the author felt the need to state that it's a dream right from the beginning. Is the man dreaming some other reality. Or was this reality so horribly revealing to him, that in his head it could only be a dream? I believe the "brat" is used as a way to show the narrators' guilt and how heavy guilt can weigh upon a person. At the beginning the child is just a mere annoyance to him on his back. When the man admits to what he has done and accepts it, only then does the weight of the child/guilt truly become a burden, just as the hold said he would. To me, the way the child being described as a shining mirror reflecting the past present and future, is another manifestation of the mans guilt. The child is not only meant to be a physical burden. The child acts a mirror reflecting the mans most truest soul. He is showing the narrators soul, unedited. It shows that guilt is not only a physical and outward burden but also one on the soul which can travel with your soul forever.
|
|
|
Post by Ariella on Sept 3, 2015 18:00:53 GMT
My discussion question would be one I couldn't understand myself. The child says the man killed him 100 years ago. Clearly the man didn't live for 100 years, so what what was the significance of choosing 100 years?
|
|
|
Post by Mina Kaneko on Sept 3, 2015 19:04:24 GMT
I too love the surrealism and the contrast between the dream and reality. I think the reality is too difficult for him to confront, and the truth is lodged somewhere deep in the narrator's unconscious. The child physically (he describes weighing on him) represents the weight of his past actions, but the voice of the child also seems to represent his conscience.
As for the hundred years - the ambiguity in meaning leaves open so many interpretations. Some other people have said this in previous threads, but I do think the one hundred years alludes to a distant past that is not in his present life. Meaning, that the hundred years is likely not literal and perhaps serves as a marker for some event in a life before -- perhaps his own former life, perhaps it represents familial burdens past down from generation to generation....
|
|